headcanon Wiktionary, the free dictionary

Some frequent examples of headcanon include relationships between characters, abilities, events following the conclusion of the work, etc. which the author or creator has not explained or included. For example, a consumer may “read between the lines” and assume that there was a previous romantic relationship between two characters where no conclusive evidence actually exists of one. Some fans who come up with particularly interesting or convincing headcanons may decide to share them with others in hopes that their idea spreads. Faith and belief are or should be flexible in at least some respects, and there are gaps that need filling, particularly in the case of traditions whose historical practices are missing or have been destroyed. Which, when you think about it, are all kinda the same thing.

An free ai art generator，powerd by Midjourney and other AI art models, with leading AI technology, add inspiration to the creation. Use Ascii Art Generator to turn photos into unique ascii art! Quick, creative, and easy with this asci art generator. When I noticed that it was “canon” and not “cannon” I realized I was missing something and set off to find the truth. Blizzard Watch is a safe space for all readers. By leaving comments on this site you agree to follow our  commenting and community guidelines.

Slightly better than mediocre whofic writer. Politics free blog because it’s my secret hideout from real life. Those accustomed to Western religions, which are centered on God or on gods, tend to think of religion as requiring some divine or supernatural element, but the broader phenomenon of religion does not demand this.

I want to SERIOUSLY emphasize this because the moderators take this EXTREMELY seriously. While they aren’t puritans, they aren’t going to look kindly on open breaches of the ToS violation in public spaces and might even consider action on actions taken in private while in game. Even if your character description links to an external site, moderators might very well be willing to take that into consideration based on what they are investigating. Remember, no matter how old the game might be, we should respect that kids might be playing.

But I know the word is also used to mean something you just decide, that isn’t at all canon compatible, and that usage isn’t wrong per se. So Lord of the Rings was one of the fandoms I had an eye on as I got into online fandom in the early aughts, and then also Silmarillion fandom. But I was pretty passive until Tumblr gave me my very own soapbox for my fandom opinions, an actual audience, and mutuals who liked to talk Tolkien from time to time. Then I started theorizing in public, and then fanfic.

Her Silmarillion Headcanon Survey now exists in several iterations and seeks to gather data on fan theories on any number of questions and ideas floating about the fandom. Scedasticity was good enough to answer my questions on the Silmarillion generate headcanon Survey, its origins, its current status, and its future. Well, if we play in a group and multiple people consider themselves part of the same storyline/AU then any effect on the world itself must be discussed by everyone involved. You can’t just declare that a planet never got blown up by yourself, if it’s important to everyone’s storyline. If you come up with a feasible way for an in-universe thing to work, show it off, share it with people. Get everyone agreeing with it, and if they don’t just limit it to how you play the character when no one else cares.

She has her own story to tell, and that story has nothing to do with superheroes. Not to mention I like having enough faith in others to assume they can be as critical of their favorite things as I can and I don’t need proof or for them to outright tell me until I’m given reason to think otherwise. It’s tiring and this is why I avoid fandom arguments where I can help it these days.

Lore that you multiple people and collaboratively build, sometimes just from a seed planted by one person. Craziest headcanon generator I ever saw from someone ingame that drove me up the wall, despite it being kind of a small detail? Marvel and DC were canon things in the CoHverse. Even ignoring the potential issues with ToS there, I just don’t understand how that could ever work.

On one level, the difference is one of evidence and perceived legitimacy. There are a lot of people out there who, to put it charitably, invest a great deal of their personal identity in the fandoms they’re a part of. To these people, the works of fiction they’re focused on are often very few in number, and constitute entire worlds in themselves that exist beyond the bounds of the text, just as our own world exists. It’s only natural to develop intense headcanons with little basis in the text if you inhabit this environment, because you lack other works within which to find the traits you’re attributing to characters in the works you’re reading. It seems utterly reasonable to me to say that if someone assumes a character is, say, from Canada, when there’s basically zero evidence within the text to support this, that it’s not in any meaningful sense a reading of the text. Yet, if they need Canadian representation for whatever reason, and they only really care about five works of fiction, it’s easy to see why they’d expand the worlds they’re concerned with such that Canadians are present.